Patient Falls Initiative - Assessment and
Identification of High Risk Patients
It was thought that all
patients were being assessed for fall risk and then identified
appropriately based on their status, per hospital policies. When
reviewing fall incident data, it was realized that some patients
appeared to have not been assessed for fall risk or at least did not
appear to be identified as being at risk for falls. This shared
revelation illuminated the need to focus on this essential aspect at the
‘front end’ and improve the portion of patients assessed and identified
as being at risk for falls.
Baseline audits at one
organization suggested that documented compliance with patient
assessment for fall risk was as low as 33%. Actual assessment
could have been higher, but not documented in the patient chart.
Great effort was
expended to further educate staff on the tools and frequently remind
them of the requirement to assess the patient for fall risk and document
the event in the patient chart.
It was felt that
face-to-face education achieved the greatest result. All hospitals
increased their emphasis on assessment for falls risk as part of their
overall intervention strategy.
An
extremely valuable learning generated by this initiative was the need to
focus on improving the assessment of patients for fall risk and then
communicating these patients’ fall risk status.
Outcomes:
-
All hospitals use a fall risk assessment tool in the patient admission
profile.
-
Assessment is performed daily, each shift and with change in patient
condition.
-
High risk patients are readily identified per established procedure,
i.e. ‘falling star’ picture by the room entrance or designation on the
identification bracelet and chart.
-
Hospitals have defined ‘order sets’ denoting interventions for
patients that are found to have high fall risk.
-
For one hospital, documented patient assessment for fall risk on
admission is up from around 33% to about 90%.
-
The aggregate percent of fallers that had previously been designated
as high fall risk is now over 95% from 42%.

|
About Us
|
Members |
Patients |
Providers |
Projects |
|
Publications |
Resources |
Contact
Us |
| HOME | |