Patient Falls Initiative
The
patient falls workgroup of the MPSC organized to reduce the number of
patients who experience a fall during hospitalization at any of the
Madison hospitals. The MPSC goals were to:
-
share information to enhance fall prevention programs
-
improve provider ability to monitor aspects of falls using
standardized fall reporting tools
-
prevent and reduce falls by implementing and evaluating targeted
interventions
The MPSC patient falls workgroup began by analyzing initial falls data
from all of the Madison hospitals and designing the action plan
components and timeline for a targeted intervention. Based on
literature, best practices from other settings and analysis of patient
falls data from the hospitals, four priority areas were identified:
Interventions
At each hospital, interventions were piloted on one unit before they
were expanded house wide. The choice of pilot unit was guided by the
units with the highest fall rates.
Intervention planning and refinement occurred in Quarters 1 and 2.
Implementation occurred in Quarter 3. The quarter in which the
intervention was implemented was considered the “run-in” quarter;
whereas the quarter post-implementation was considered the timeframe for
tracking changes in fall rate.
Lessons Learned
Throughout this large scale initiative, the Fall Reduction team
experienced several valuable lessons:
Attrition of the hospital teams
-
Three of the four hospital teams lost at least one team member.
-
Attrition was due to maternity leave, sick leave and new jobs at other
employers.
This did however make progress difficult for the organizations—with one
team losing all but one member. This particular team was not able to get
the sleeper protocol started and sustained for the duration of the
pilot. Other components of the project were implemented, however.
Careful construction and maintenance of project teams is essential for
progress.
HIPAA regulations
-
Difficult to share a common database among hospitals
Aggregating data
-
Each hospital had different incident reports and tracked different
factors related to falls.
The
project allowed the group to evaluate whether key components were
included in each hospital’s incident report, such as patient
medications, and incorporate those absent. The most successful approach
to sharing information was to have each hospital periodically share its
aggregate analysis of incident reports with the other hospitals.
Results
The
goal of this initiative was to achieve at least a 20% decrease in the
falls rate for the target units post-intervention.
Secondary goals were to:
-
Decrease the use of sleepers on target units
-
Decrease the percentage of fallers who had received a sleeper within
12 hours prior to the fall
-
Create and maintain high staff adherence with safe room set-up
-
Increase the percentage of patients who are assessed for falls risk at
admission
-
Demonstrate that an increased percentage of fallers have been assessed
for falls risk before the fall
The
group implemented numerous processes to prevent falls and harm at the
hospitals and achieved significant progress in each of these priority
areas. Important process steps implemented through this project include
the formation of a defined fall prevention team at each hospital and
ensuring that all hospitals include a fall risk assessment tool in the
patient admission profile.
-
Fall rates were down in the fourth quarter (Q4) for the 3
hospitals where Q4 was the first quarter post-intervention.
-
Fall rates were down in both the third (Q3) and fourth quarters
for Hospital B, where Q3 was the first quarter post-intervention.
-
In the first quarter after interventions were in place at all 4
organizations falls were down an average of
51%.
Percentage change in fall rates from Q3 to
Q4
| |
Intervention |
Change |
| Hospital A |
Education on: Sleeping Aid protocol, environmental, SRSU, patient
assessment and per below |
-100% |
| Hospital B |
Environmental—SRS, Sleeping Aid Protocol,
Education |
-39.8% |
| Hospital C |
Sleeping Aid Protocol, Education |
-17.2% |
| Hospital C (Target unit
2) |
Focus on increased Patient Assessment, Education |
-59.8% |
| Hospital D |
Environmental—SRSU, Sleeping Aid Protocol,
Education |
-38.3% |
| Average |
|
-51% |
Topics comprising education included: fall risk factors, assessment &
identification, the prevalence & consequences of falls, impact of
medications, environmental modification, use of assistive and protective
equipment, and toileting, etc.
|
About Us
|
Members |
Patients |
Providers |
Projects |
|
Publications |
Resources |
Contact
Us |
| HOME | |